Accessibility of AI
Can disabled and neurodivergent people use the AI system?
This includes accessible interfaces, keyboard and speech interaction, screen-reader compatibility, multimodal alternatives and manageable conversational experiences.
AI accessibility is fundamentally cognitive accessibility
Artificial intelligence can remove accessibility barriers. It can also create entirely new ones.
The COGAI definition
AI accessibility concerns whether disabled and neurodivergent people can access AI, understand its outputs, obtain equitable outcomes and remain in control when AI influences important parts of their lives.
It is broader than using AI to generate captions or alternative text. It includes the accessibility of an AI product, the barriers AI can remove, and the consequences people face when AI makes, supports or mediates decisions.
A complete definition
An organisation needs to consider all three. Improving one does not cancel out harm in another.
Can disabled and neurodivergent people use the AI system?
This includes accessible interfaces, keyboard and speech interaction, screen-reader compatibility, multimodal alternatives and manageable conversational experiences.
Can AI remove or reduce barriers?
AI can support captioning, alternative text, summarisation, explanation, adaptation, communication and other assistive experiences—when its output is reliable and checked.
What happens when AI influences a person?
People need to understand, question and correct AI-mediated decisions. The system must not interpret disability, neurodivergence, communication or behaviour unfairly.
From interface to institution
Interfaces, conversational systems, multimodal AI, agents, assistive technology compatibility, keyboard and speech interaction, and WCAG.
Prompting burden, comprehension, memory demand, uncertainty, hallucination, information overload, explainability, error recovery, trust calibration and human agency.
Recruitment, financial services, education, employment, healthcare, automated decisions, disability bias, neurodivergence, vulnerable users and high-risk journeys.
Procurement, design requirements, assurance, testing, evidence, organisational ownership, risk escalation and ongoing monitoring.
COGAI AI Accessibility Framework
This human-centred sequence can guide discovery, design reviews, procurement, testing, assurance and incident learning. It is an assessment lens, not a substitute for applicable standards or legal advice.
Can I perceive, reach and operate it in a way that works for me?
Can I understand the interaction, output and language without unnecessary effort?
Can I recognise uncertainty, limitations, evidence and possible error?
Can I make an informed choice without manipulation or avoidable pressure?
Can I correct, challenge, opt out or reach a person where appropriate?
Can I identify what went wrong and put it right without disproportionate harm?
Turn the framework into practice
Start with how AI systems communicate and behave, then develop the skills to design AI-supported decisions around human cognition, uncertainty and control.
CAIS
Learn where AI can break human understanding and how to create clearer, more structured, interpretable and governable AI experiences.
Explore the CAIS courseCDD
Learn to design AI-supported decisions around attention, memory, trust and uncertainty while preserving agency, challenge and recovery.
Explore the CDD courseAccessibility under AI
Risk becomes especially important when AI influences access to work, learning, money, healthcare, support or essential services.
Governance and evidence
AI accessibility should be owned across accessibility, product, design, engineering, procurement, legal, risk, human resources, data and service operations. Teams need requirements before purchase or build, participation by disabled people, evidence-based testing, routes for challenge and correction, and monitoring after deployment.
The EU AI Act addresses accessibility, universal design, vulnerable groups and AI practices that exploit vulnerabilities related to disability. Its requirements vary by system and application date, so organisations should assess their specific context rather than rely on a general summary.
Read the EU AI Act on EUR-Lex · See the European Commission AI Act overview · Explore W3C cognitive accessibility guidance
Clear answers
AI accessibility is the practice of ensuring disabled and neurodivergent people can access and understand AI, benefit from it, and remain protected and in control when AI influences decisions or services.
No. Those are examples of accessibility through AI. AI accessibility also covers whether the AI itself is usable and whether AI-mediated decisions, recommendations and interactions are understandable, fair and challengeable.
AI interactions can place heavy demands on attention, memory, language, judgement and trust. Cognitive accessibility asks whether people can understand what the AI is doing, assess its output, make an informed decision and recover from error.
It is a shared responsibility across accessibility, AI governance, product, design, engineering, procurement, legal, risk, data, human resources and service operations.
The COGAI position
AI accessibility is not solely a technical feature or an accessibility-team task. It is an organisational capability.